Structural Density and Syllable Constraints in Buginese An Analysis of Phonotactic of Sidrap Dialectal Variation

Main Article Content

Vera Verisca
Damayanti

Abstract

This study investigates the phonotactic architecture of the Buginese language to determine whether syllable constraints differ significantly across word classes. The primary objective is to comparatively analyze the structural boundaries of nouns, verbs, and adjectives. Utilizing a qualitative descriptive approach supported by quantitative cross-tabulation, this research examines a corpus of ninety basic root words. Data was purposefully categorized by syntactic function, with adjectives specifically sourced from the Sidrap dialect to control for regional morphophonological variations. The findings reveal a strict tripartite typological divide, proving that phonotactic patterns are not homogeneous across the lexicon. Nouns exhibit profound diachronic stability, heavily favoring disyllabic open structures while uniquely permitting pure vowel onsets. Conversely, verbs demonstrate a dynamic, front-heavy tetrasyllabic expansion driven by prefixation and initial consonant gemination, yet they absolutely enforce an open-vowel termination. Adjectives present the highest structural density, utilizing a back-heavy architecture with complex closed codas to signal grammatical intensification. These distinct phonetic territories demonstrate that Buginese phonotactics function as active, pre-lexical syntactic markers, where the physical shape of a word categorizes its grammatical role before semantic decoding. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Verisca, V., & Damayanti. (2025). Structural Density and Syllable Constraints in Buginese: An Analysis of Phonotactic of Sidrap Dialectal Variation. Applied Linguistics: Innovative Approaches and Emerging Trends, 2(2), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.58989/b4mrke74
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Verisca, V., & Damayanti. (2025). Structural Density and Syllable Constraints in Buginese: An Analysis of Phonotactic of Sidrap Dialectal Variation. Applied Linguistics: Innovative Approaches and Emerging Trends, 2(2), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.58989/b4mrke74

References

Journals

Shooshtaryzadeh, F. (2015). Optimality theory and assessment of developing and disordered phonologies. Speech, Language and Hearing, 29(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2131.185975

Talaohu, A. (2019). The phonetics system in Buginese language. KLAUSA (Kajian Linguistik, Pembelajaran Bahasa, dan Sastra), 3(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.33479/klausa.v3i01.146

Vitevitch, M. S., Niehorster-Cook, L., & Niehorster-Cook, S. (2021). Exploring how phonotactic knowledge can be represented in cognitive networks. BDCC, 5(4), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDCC5040047

Books

Blevins, J. (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In J. A. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 206–244). Blackwell.

Dekkers, J., van der Leeuw, F., & van de Weijer, J. (Eds.). (2000). Optimality theory: Phonology, syntax, and acquisition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238430.001.0001

Dixon, R. M. W. (2010). Basic linguistic theory volume 2: Grammatical topics. Oxford University Press.

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., Hyams, N. M., Amberber, M., Cox, F., & Thornton, R. (2017). An introduction to language with online study tools 12 months. Cengage AU.

Gouskova, M. (2018). Morphology and phonotactics. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.613

Mills, R. F. (1975). Reconstruction of Proto-South-Sulawesi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Michigan.

Smith, J. L. (2001). Lexical category and phonological contrast [Unpublished manuscript]. http://www.unc.edu/~jlsmith/home/pdf/uab-wp.pdf

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Proceedings

Smith, J. L. (2014). Prototypical predicates have unmarked phonology. Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Meeting on Phonology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.3765/AMP.V1I1.37

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.