Strategies and Challenges In Teaching Vowel Digraphs For EFL Learners A Systematic Literature Review

Main Article Content

Rizky Anugrah Putra
Moh. Fahruddin Aziz
Herlandri Eka Jaya Putri

Abstract

English vowel digraphs pose significant challenges for English as a Foreign Language learners due to deep orthographic irregularities and native language interference. This systematic literature review investigates teachers' challenges and material preparation strategies for mitigating these linguistic barriers. Following PRISMA guidelines, 74 articles across major databases were rigorously screened, yielding 8 highly relevant peer-reviewed studies for thematic synthesis. The analysis reveals a critical phonetic gap; notably, studies show that most of EFL students lack adequate grapheme-phoneme knowledge for digraph decoding. To mitigate this, educators are abandoning native-centric textbooks in favor of targeted pedagogical strategies. Integrating technology-enhanced language learning tools and explicit phonics instruction significantly improves decoding accuracy. Furthermore, bespoke phonics-based pronunciation innovations demonstrated high efficacy, has significant instructional efficiency scores in targeted classrooms. Ultimately, overcoming orthographic barriers requires explicit phonetic instruction and the localized development of bespoke, technology-enhanced teaching materials to master irregular spelling patterns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Putra, R. A., Aziz, M. F., & Putri, H. E. J. (2026). Strategies and Challenges In Teaching Vowel Digraphs For EFL Learners: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied Linguistics: Innovative Approaches and Emerging Trends, 3(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.58989/m40r1x52
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Putra, R. A., Aziz, M. F., & Putri, H. E. J. (2026). Strategies and Challenges In Teaching Vowel Digraphs For EFL Learners: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied Linguistics: Innovative Approaches and Emerging Trends, 3(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.58989/m40r1x52

References

Journals

Abker, I. A. A. (2020). Pronunciation problems of English diphthongs sounds encountered by Saudi students at Albaha University, Saudi Arabia: A case study in Almandag. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(4), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.7575/AIAC.IJALEL.V.9N.4P.37

Al-Hamzi, A. M. S., Al-Shrgabi, A. H. A. S., Al-Haidari, A. S. A., Faraj, M. M. A., & Al-Housali, T. A. A. (2021). Pronunciation errors of English front vowels by Yemeni EFL learners. Parole: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 11(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.14710/PAROLE.V11I1.%P

Al-Jarf, R. (2015). A model for enhancing EFL freshman students’ vocabulary with mind-mapping software. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 3(Special Issue), 509–520. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3851301

Almekhlafy, S. S. A. (2021). Phonological and morphological basis underlying the English graphophonemic knowledge of preparatory year students at Saudi universities. MEXTESOL Journal, 45(2), Article n2.

Bajo, M. T., Burton, A., Burton, E., & Canas, J.-J. (1994). Word recognition across orthographies: Another look at the interaction between context and degradation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449408520142

Buetler, K. A., De León Rodríguez, D., Laganaro, M., Müri, R. M., Spierer, L., & Annoni, J.-M. (2014). Language context modulates reading route: An electrical neuroimaging study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 83. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00083

Donal, A. (2016). Indonesian students’ difficulties in pronouncing English diphtongs. Journal of English and Education, 2(2), 55–62. https://e-journal.upp.ac.id/index.php/jee/article/view/1305

Hussain, M., & Ahmed, T. (2025). Lexical issues in English language learning and teaching at the university level in Lahore. Social Science Review Archives, 3(4), 3435–3441. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i4.1433

Kurniasy, D., Idami, Z., Keumala, M., & Husna, N. H. (2023). “[eɪ], [oʊ], [aɪ]”: A quantitative study on high school students’ errors in pronouncing English diphthong. International Journal of Education, Language, and Religion, 5(2), 99–108.

Lysenko, K., & Nesterenko, N. (2024). Pronunciation perils: Overcoming phonetic interference in language learning. Grail of Science, (39), 386–392. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.10.05.2024.059

Mramboa, A., & Ligembe, N. (2022). Challenges pupils face in learning phonological skills: A case of Bunda District, Tanzania. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2022v03i01.0145

Putra, R. A. (2023a). Deciphering English vowel digraphs: Pronunciation challenges in the EFL classroom. Pulchra Lingua: A Journal of Language Study, Literature & Linguistics, 2(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.58989/plj.v2i2.26

Putra, R. A. (2023b). The efficacy of English phonics instruction in helping EFL students to decode vowel digraph letters. Pulchra Lingua: A Journal of Language Study, Literature & Linguistics, 2(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.58989/plj.v2i1.20

Rashid, S., & Malik, S. (2026). Exploring EFL learners’ switching intention to AI-assisted learning through push-pull-mooring framework: A SEM analysis. Cogent Education, 13(1).

Russak, S. (2022). How can a fine-grained analysis of spelling errors inform our understanding of the development of spelling in EFL?. Written Language & Literacy, 25(1), 67–98.

Sarimsakova, N. R., & Yusupova, M. A. (2025). Bridging the gap: Colligation-based instruction and the mitigation of L1 interference in vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Science and Technology, 2(5), 172–174. https://doi.org/10.70728/tech.v2.i05.062

Schmalz, X., Beyersmann, E., Cavalli, E., & Marinus, E. (2016). Unpredictability and complexity of print-to-speech correspondences increase reliance on lexical processes: More evidence for the orthographic depth hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2016.1182172

Schwartz, M., Ibrahim, R., & Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2016). Multi-literate experience as a treasure chest for young learners of English as a foreign language. Reading and Writing, 29(7), 1293–1315.

Setyaningsih, K. P., Wijayanto, A., & Suparno, S. (2019). English vowels and diphthongs problems of Sundanese learners. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 2(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v2i4.8413

Sukkrong, J., Chanphram, K., & Wiangin, N. (2026). The development of a phonics-based pronunciation innovation to enhance young learners’ English pronunciation. Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Burapha University, 34(1), 148–161.

Višić, M. (2022). Connecting puzzle pieces: Systematic literature review method in the social sciences. Sociologija, 64(4), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.2298/soc2204543v

Wang, X., & Li, J. (2025). Asymmetrical cognate facilitation effects: The orthographic depth hypothesis revisited in bi-script readers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728925100217

Books

Kumar, A. (2023). Systematic literature review (SLR). In Meta-analysis in clinical research: Principles and procedures. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2370-0_2

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.